It beats the hell out of me why, when an international incident and the need for military action is averted, all the Brits join with American neocons and hawks in bemoaning the rancid aftertaste. The biggest problem in the world today is men who STILL think that the best way to deal with a swaggering schoolyard bully is to drop bombs on civilians or engage in some sort of counter-swagger. Why? Why? I mean, there is definitely a time and a place for intervention, but Iran's capture of British sailor and speedy return of them unharmed wouldn't seem to be the time OR the place.
Who cares if he pretended to be doing Britain a favor? Does anyone with a brain really believe that this was the case? I mean, JESUS. Anyway, I was pretty sheepish at having rejoiced prematurely that the whole farce had ended without blood shed, and I said so here. Geoffrey Wheatcroft at Slate schooled me in the correct, dour view.
I felt better when I saw Mickey Kaus (also at Slate) shared my bemusement. "Didn't Iran blink?" he asked. Seemed so. Seemed so.
Finally, my husband (also a Brit) weighed in with his own opinion (and dour view). In addition to feeling humiliated because Blair didn't engage in a more "robust" display of swagger, he was also disappointed at the deportment of the hostages. Colditz, John McCain, duty to escape, a sense of dignity: his disappointment, and my continuing efforts to understand, are all discussed here.